Prosodic boundary strength and prevocalic T-glottaling in Massachusetts English
Kamil Kaźmierski
Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Accents 2023 Łódź:: November 30 - December 2, 2023
kamil.kazmierski@amu.edu.pl
Slides available at: kazmierski-accents2023.netlify.app



Kaźmierski, Kamil. 2020. Prevocalic t-glottaling across word boundaries in Midland American English. Laboratory Phonology 11(1), 1-23.

(Fromont & Hay 2012)brms (Bürkner 2017) in R (R Core Team 2023)







ʔ and ◌̰ → ʔ
ʔ and ◌̰ → ʔ
ɾ → ɾ
ʔ and ◌̰ → ʔ
ɾ → ɾ
the rest → 🚮
ʔ and ◌̰ → ʔ
ɾ → ɾ
the rest → 🚮
N = 1,652 → 1,517






Probability of glottaling over flapping, shaded area indicates 95% Credible Interval






This research was supported by the Polish-American Fulbright Commission

No automatically detected prosodic boundary at X: "I don't get it X I hate", but there is a syntactic boundary. Maybe glottaling is a more direct reflection of syntax than of prosody? Or maybe the objective, signal derived prosody is not the right approach?
Keyboard shortcuts
| ↑, ←, Pg Up, k | Go to previous slide |
| ↓, →, Pg Dn, Space, j | Go to next slide |
| Home | Go to first slide |
| End | Go to last slide |
| Number + Return | Go to specific slide |
| b / m / f | Toggle blackout / mirrored / fullscreen mode |
| c | Clone slideshow |
| p | Toggle presenter mode |
| t | Restart the presentation timer |
| ?, h | Toggle this help |
| o | Tile View: Overview of Slides |
| s | Toggle scribble toolbox |
| Esc | Back to slideshow |
Prosodic boundary strength and prevocalic T-glottaling in Massachusetts English
Kamil Kaźmierski
Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Accents 2023 Łódź:: November 30 - December 2, 2023
kamil.kazmierski@amu.edu.pl
Slides available at: kazmierski-accents2023.netlify.app



Kaźmierski, Kamil. 2020. Prevocalic t-glottaling across word boundaries in Midland American English. Laboratory Phonology 11(1), 1-23.

(Fromont & Hay 2012)brms (Bürkner 2017) in R (R Core Team 2023)







ʔ and ◌̰ → ʔ
ʔ and ◌̰ → ʔ
ɾ → ɾ
ʔ and ◌̰ → ʔ
ɾ → ɾ
the rest → 🚮
ʔ and ◌̰ → ʔ
ɾ → ɾ
the rest → 🚮
N = 1,652 → 1,517






Probability of glottaling over flapping, shaded area indicates 95% Credible Interval






This research was supported by the Polish-American Fulbright Commission

No automatically detected prosodic boundary at X: "I don't get it X I hate", but there is a syntactic boundary. Maybe glottaling is a more direct reflection of syntax than of prosody? Or maybe the objective, signal derived prosody is not the right approach?